Port of Seattle is major economic engine for region, candidates say
October 26, 2011
By Tom Corrigan
In November, voters in King County, including those in Snoqualmie Valley, will be asked to choose from among four candidates hoping to serve as commissioners for the Port of Seattle.
The port includes both the seaport in downtown Seattle and Sea-Tac International Airport. According to the port’s annual report for 2010, the port collected $75.6 million in property taxes in 2009. The projection for 2010 was $73.5 million. Those collections come from all King County residents.
Bill Bryant
Dean Willard
“The port is an economic engine for the entire county, not just the city of Seattle,” said Charla Skaggs, corporate media officer for the port.
Both Skaggs and other port officials said thousands of jobs depend directly and indirectly on port operations. According to what is billed by the port as an independent report released in 2009, the port was directly and indirectly responsible for 190,000 jobs in the Puget Sound region.
Port facilities generated more than $17 billion in revenue for businesses who deal with the port or the port tenants who operate the maritime terminals. All in all, those employers and employees pay about $867 million in state and local taxes.
Finally, the 2009 report stated that more than 135,000 people are employed at regional businesses that have cargo moving through the Port of Seattle.
Skaggs talked about how plenty of Eastside companies depend on the port for importing or exporting goods and raw materials. She stated port operations create a wide variety of jobs from the longshoremen who load and unload cargo to cruise ship employees.
Port operations themselves employ about 1,600 people, said Port Commission President Bill Bryant, one of two incumbent commission members up for election this year.
All in all, just from its maritime operations, Bryant said about 70,000 families depend on the port. Although his opponent in the upcoming election disagrees, Bryant said those jobs are well-paying, family-wage positions. He further argued the port is one of the top five or six job creators in King County, right up on the list with Boeing and Microsoft.
“I think the port is becoming an example of an agency that can create jobs,” Bryant said.
Bryant also wants to help support existing jobs and to create new ones outside Seattle by steering cruise ship tourists to visit places such as Snoqualmie Falls.
“There is no doubt the port is a critical economic engine for the region,” said Dean Willard, who is opposing Bryant for the latter’s spot on the port commission.
Willard specifically said the port does not do enough to create living-wage jobs, but also was highly critical of the port’s environmental record.
“I have observed decisions that are not transparent and not reflective of local values,” Willard said, adding those local values include environmentally sound operations. Bryant sharply disagreed, arguing the port’s environmental record is another reason the institution is important to voters and residents in the Puget Sound area.
As one example of what he said is the port’s environmental stewardship, Bryant pointed to what ultimately becomes of contaminated dredging materials the port removes from around its maritime facilities.
He said the port legally could dump those materials into Elliot Bay. Instead, the port takes on the added expense of having the materials moved inland.
As one example of how the port has dropped the ball environmentally, Willard pointed to what he said is the port’s lack of attention to problems with the Duwamish River. He said the port undoubtedly has a shared responsibility for cleaning up the waterway.
For his part, Bryant agreed the port has some responsibility for the Duwamish, but said officials are living up to the responsibility. He said the port has supported a plan to restore the river’s habitat, another environmental step he said the organization was not required to take.
Another voluntary environmental move, according to Bryant, includes replacing outdated port trucks with newer, more efficient models. By 2015, he said all port trucks must meet certain EPA standards.
Willard said Bryant and other board members consistently “talk the talk, but fail to walk the walk.”
For example, he again argued the port’s efforts regarding the Duwamish are completely insufficient. Willard backed a protest held downtown Sept. 15 as the Port of Seattle was hosting the American Association of Port Authorities.
The group directly mounting the protest is known as Puget Sound Sage. Among other claims, the group charges seaport truck drivers often are forced to work 10- to 12-hour shifts while not receiving health benefits or sick time and earning about $28,500 a year.
Tom Corrigan: 392-6434, ext. 241, or tcorrigan@isspress.com.
Comments
4 Responses to “Port of Seattle is major economic engine for region, candidates say”
Got something to say?
Before you comment, please note:
- These comments are moderated.
- Comments should be relevant to the topic at hand and contribute to its discussion.
- Personal attacks and/or excessive profanity will not be tolerated and such comments will not be approved.
- This is not your personal chat room or forum, so please stay on topic.
[...] By Tom Corrigan (snovalleystar) [...]
[...] By Tom Corrigan (snovalleystar) [...]
[...] By Tom Corrigan (snovalleystar) [...]
I am speaking up and January 10, 2013 I submitted my application to be in consideration as a Port of Seattle Commissioner. I look forward on January 22, 2013 to answering questions at the Commissioner’s meeting.
I have joined the Port of Seattle Commissioner’s race and would like to be appointed as a Commissioner in the open position. Thanks for this site..